Skip to main content

Why is the Indian constitution unique? - Part II

Continued from here 
The consolidation the territorial boundaries was only half the job done – what was in the hands of the provisional government in 1947-49 was just a kingdom and not a Nation. The forging of a nation from this kingdom required visionary wisdom and unflinching determination to principle of ‘multi-cultural’ nationalism.

Operationally, the issue of sub-nationalities was resolved by instituting a pseudo-federal governance system. ‘Pseudo’ because unlike an ideal federal system, the ‘union’ or whole was not made up of the smaller ‘states’.

Upholding the original territories (some of them governed by Royalties) and ‘combining’ them to form the nation would have been disastrous.

It would have meant allowing each state to have its own territorial borders, and a deluge of pacts and negotiations to freeze them – which would have broken down time and again, sinking the region into perpetual strife.

Instead, the first step was, to consolidate all military power with the Union and entrusting it with protection of the borders with neighbouring countries. In effect this meant that the sub-nationalities that composed India had to give up their ‘sovereignty’ in favour of a ‘shared sovereignty’ of the Union.

Notably, ‘shared sovereignty’ would be an oxymoron as per Jean Bodin, yet was the only way to maintain (minority) rights for each sub-nationality, while continuing to forge a single nation out of them.

The next step was designing a constitution that would allow peoples to maintain their communities and yet not create a ‘divide’ between them. One of the systemic features introduced by the constitution was the clerical task of dividing responsibilities between the ‘State governments’ and the ‘Union government’.

This mundane looking step was a leap towards providing ‘cultural’ security to different sections and subsections while keeping the territorial tendencies of the communities at bay. So while a state could decide what language students would learn within their boundaries - they could not decide ‘what’ those boundaries would be.

The division of responsibilities was done very astutely leaving all functions of a ‘Civil Society’ to local governments and awarding all territorial responsibilities not only for the national borders but even state borders to the Union as a whole.

Foreign Relations and Military Development thus automatically became a Union subject ruling out possibility any foreign intervention in deciding intra-union territorial disputes.

Another major quirk of the Indian system was that the Union government was elected directly by the people and thus was in not affected by the ‘loyalties’ or allegiances of the ‘state governments’ towards it.
This averted all possibilities of allowing a ‘state’ to rebel against the Union because even the people of the state had voted to bring about the government against whom the rebellion would be directed. Article 360 which empowers the Union Government to dismiss a State Government is the explicit manifestation of these principles.

While this all might seem too obvious, it was not so and a living example of the failure to invent and implement such careful systemic balances, is the neighbouring country of Pakistan.

Given that Pakistan was created on the basis of the two-nation theory, there was no way any other cultural subsections could be accepted in the Pakistani polity. Since Pakistan was now ‘one’ nation – how could it have many others within itself? The nonchalant acceptance of the two-nation theory resulted in Pakistan continuing to remain a kingdom which could never forge into becoming a nation.

Coming back to the Indian constitution – it delivered satisfactory results for the people. People were now guaranteed a peaceful existence wherein they could practice their own culture and customs – while not harming the others’.

The Federal system has today matured with the intermingling of the peoples – so that now you have Tamilians of Delhi, Marathis of MP, Saurashtrians of Karnataka and Marwadis of Bengal, Punjabis of Assam - all practicing their customs irrespective of their locations - but voting for state governments in their respective states and for the Union government as a whole.

What this effectively means is that the sub-nationalities that the different ‘states’ originally represented, have now been deconstructed and converted into cultural communities, which not only can coexist in the same space, also intermingle and create new sub-cultures .
They are fast approaching a stage where they will no more need territorial boundaries for their fortification; as a result every state is fast becoming a microcosm of the Union itself and India is fast becoming a nation of many minorities and a single majority – a majority of multiculturalists.

The nature of the Union too has been transformed. Coalition politics has brought upon the regional political parties getting a stake in the Union ministries. It is notable here that a similar arrangement - where ministers are apportioned in accord with party strengths in the assembly rather than the ‘winner-take-all’ approach - has been formally adopted in Northern Ireland as a part of the Good Friday accord with the Irish republic.

This is one scenario where the Indian constitution did not invent a systemic change but did provide a strong base for its voluntary evolution.

[There have been however, lapses in proper implementation of the constitution at some places which have led to many problems like the resurgence of casteist and communal mafia, remnants of territorial struggles. But these must be seen strictly as failures in implementation than design of the system.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How will travel industry transform post-Covid

Unlike philosophers, journalists and teenagers, the world of entrepreneurship does not permit the luxury of gazing into a crystal ball to predict the future. An entrepreneur’s world is instead made of MVPs (Minimum Viable Product), A/B Tests, launching products, features or services and gauging / measuring their reception in the market to arrive at verifiable truths which can drive the business forward. Which is why I have never written about my musings or hypothesis about travel industry – we usually either seek customer feedback or launch an MVPised version and gather market feedback. However, with Covid-19 travel bans across the globe, the industry is currently stuck – while a lot of industry reports and journalistic conjectures are out, there’s no definitive answer to the way forward. Besides there is no way to test your hypothesis since even the traveller does not know what they will do when skies open. So, I decided to don my blogger hat and take the luxury of crystal gazing

Experienced vs. Freshers – an MBA perspective

Shubham and me compiled and created an article during our first year of MBA. It was never published, nevertheless MBA aspirants will find it very useful. Publishing it online for the same purpose. However, Shubham and myself claim a copyright on the text .... and of course very many thanks to all our freinds whose views have helped us compile the article. Experienced vs. Freshers – an MBA perspective By Nikhil Kulkarni, KPMG Shubham Choudhury, Infosys PGDIM- X, NITIE, Mumbai Ashita Mittal was placed during her final year in engineering college with a leading software firm. But she never wanted to be another brick in the wall. She wanted to differentiate herself from other graduates who start their career at the lowest rung of organizational hierarchy. MBA was a natural choice for her. On the other side is Shailesh Dhawla, who worked as a software engineer with a leading software consultancy firm for 3 years. He started his job with some ends in mind, like working with a known c

हिंदी दिवस के उपलक्ष्य में एक ट्वीटमाला

A thread on Hindi Diwas; for the last few months I have been influencing my daughter to learn Hindi by telling her greatness & elegance of Hindi हिंदी दिवस के उपलक्ष्य में एक ट्वीटमाला; पिछले कुछ माह से मैं अपनी बेटी को हिंदी की महत्ता और लालित्य के बारे में समझा रहा हूँ| She is in Grade 2 and just started learning the Hindi alphabet and grammar.  वह कक्षा २ में है और अभी हिंदी वर्णमाला और व्याकरण के पहले पाठ पढ़ रही है|  Yesterday, she asked me why I think Hindi is a great language. Context being India has so many languages and our mother tongue is Marathi.  कल उसने मुझे पूछा कि मैं हिंदी को एक महानतम भाषा क्यों मानता हूँ - जबकी भारत में इतनी सारी भाषाएँ हैं और हमारी मातृभाषा मराठी है|  My answer - No doubt Hindi is a rich language in terms of literature, vocabulary, variety and its script Devnagiri is very scientific in nature...  मेरा उत्तर था की यद्यपी हिंदी साहित्य, शब्दावली, विविधता से परिपूर्ण हैं और उसकी प्रमुख लिपी देवनागिरी वैज्ञानिक है, ...  ... But then these virtues des