Skip to main content

India-US collaboration is missing the key subject of Data Protection laws

It’s a national embarrassment for both India and the US that they don't have a data privacy law 

The Indian Prime minister Modi is in the US and amongst much fanfare a lot of joint initiatives are being announced. But one area which could have been a major bedrock for a global regulation has not even been touched. On the contrary, both governments are now engaged in regressive moves on this subject - the subject of Personal Data Protection.

TikTok, the popular video-sharing app, has faced bans in several countries, including India, and now there are discussions about a potential ban in the United States as well. The concerns primarily revolve around data privacy and surveillance, with lawmakers pointing out the extensive collection of personal information by TikTok and its Chinese ownership. However, focusing solely on banning TikTok fails to address the broader issue of data privacy and government access to user information.

Banning TikTok might seem like a straightforward solution to protect user data, but it overlooks important factors. Firstly, while TikTok is being singled out, other popular social media platforms like Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Snapchat, and Twitter also collect substantial amounts of user data. Secondly, a ban on TikTok alone would not be effective since the Chinese government could potentially access similar information through data brokers, which remain largely unregulated in the US.

To prevent governments from weaponizing user data, a more comprehensive approach is necessary. Instead of resorting to censorship or banning individual apps, governments should focus on passing robust data privacy laws. The European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) serves as an example of legislation that limits data collection by companies to only what is necessary to provide requested services. Implementing similar laws would safeguard user privacy and ensure that companies are accountable for their data practices.

Unfortunately, lawmakers are trying to solve the problem by using blanket bans and authoritarian approaches. Part of the reason why they're solving it the wrong way is because their own intentions are not always pristine - while they would want to block Chinese govt from getting access to their citizen's private data, they want this data for themselves so that they can strangulate the rights of their own citizens when they want to suit their own politican and ideological agenda. While certain instances, such as matters of national security, may warrant access to specific data, the solution being sought seems one-sided and fails to consider the potential for government manipulation and abuse of power.

In the case of India, for example, the country is in the process of formulating The Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022. However, the bill excludes governments and regulators from its purview, despite evidence indicating that government entities are more susceptible to data breaches compared to private companies. Insufficient cybersecurity competence within government ranks and inadequate investment in cybersecurity make government entities vulnerable to potential data leaks. Therefore, excluding them from data protection responsibilities is a flawed approach.

The ongoing debate surrounding the TikTok ban highlights the need for a more comprehensive and thoughtful approach to data privacy. Banning individual apps or targeting specific companies fails to address the broader issue of data collection and government access to user information. Governments must prioritize the enactment of strong national data privacy laws, taking cues from successful models like the GDPR. 

Only through comprehensive legislation and responsible data practices can individuals' privacy be protected and potential government abuses mitigated. It is essential for policymakers to recognize the need for a balanced approach that upholds citizens' rights while addressing legitimate concerns related to national security and public safety.

.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How will travel industry transform post-Covid

Unlike philosophers, journalists and teenagers, the world of entrepreneurship does not permit the luxury of gazing into a crystal ball to predict the future. An entrepreneur’s world is instead made of MVPs (Minimum Viable Product), A/B Tests, launching products, features or services and gauging / measuring their reception in the market to arrive at verifiable truths which can drive the business forward. Which is why I have never written about my musings or hypothesis about travel industry – we usually either seek customer feedback or launch an MVPised version and gather market feedback. However, with Covid-19 travel bans across the globe, the industry is currently stuck – while a lot of industry reports and journalistic conjectures are out, there’s no definitive answer to the way forward. Besides there is no way to test your hypothesis since even the traveller does not know what they will do when skies open. So, I decided to don my blogger hat and take the luxury of crystal gazing

A Guide to Privacy on Social Media [apps]

The recent announcement by WhatsApp to update its privacy terms - and 'accept or leave the app' stance - led to an exodus of users from Whastapp to competing, privacy-conscious apps such as Telegram or Signal. A week after the exodus began, Whatsapp clarified its stance - and WhatsApp's CEO went about providing a long Twitter clarification . And then, many returned, many who considered moving stayed put on Whatsapp. This post is meant for those who are still sitting on the fence - it clarifies questions like: What is this all about? What do I do? Is Whatsapp safe? I've heard Telegram is Russian - so how is it safer than Whatsapp? I can't move because my business contacts are on Whastapp - how do I secure myself? PS: I've modeled this post based on several conversations I've had with friends and family on this subject, dealing with the chain of questions they ask, then objections they raise, then clarifications they seek - and finally the change resistance

Learning from 11 years in KPMG

It is only when we give up what we have is when we can embrace the new! I quit my job at KPMG one year ago - 22 January 2016 was my last day with the firm. As I reflect back on that day, it felt more like a graduation day! The eerie mix of nostalgia, excitement, anxiety and blues of missing your friends. KPMG was not just my first job but also a place where I learnt everything that I represent professionally. KPMG is one of the institutions I deeply respect and love – and relationships I have built here will stay with me for my lifetime. In my entrepreneurial career as well, I am often reminded more of all the great things I have learnt over my 11 years in KPMG. An year gone by, I realize these learnings have stayed with me and apply equally to the world outside KPMG. Almost all would apply to those working in role of (internal or external) consultants but several are generic and can be applied across professions. I have tried to change the text so that the learnings sound