![]() |
| Image Source: Hindustan Times |
The recently concluded Mumbai civic polls mark one of the most pivotal political moments for Mumbai - and the larger Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) - in over three decades. To fully grasp their significance, one must go back to 1995, when Bal Thackeray and the Shiv Sena first rose to power in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). Since then, control of Mumbai’s civic body has been the unquestioned crown jewel of Marathi local politics - whoever won Mumbai, was sure to be the power broker at the Maharashtra state level. That era has now decisively ended.
The Fall of the Thackeray Stronghold
For Uddhav Thackeray, this election represents more than just a political loss - it is the forfeiture of the family’s most valuable inheritance. The BMC, formerly the Bombay Municipal Corporation but now the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, is not only the richest municipal corporation in India but arguably the largest local body in the world by population [rivaling Shanghai and Tokyo]. For decades, it served as both the ideological nerve center and the financial backbone of the Thackeray-led Shiv Sena.
The loss is therefore existential. Without control of the BMC, Sena (UBT) stands to lose not just institutional power but also the steady flow of political and financial resources required to sustain modern political campaigns - campaigns that have become increasingly expensive under the Bharatiya Janata Party’s highly centralized, resource-intensive electoral model. This defeat is likely to have cascading effects, gradually eroding the party’s organizational heft, cadre morale, and voter confidence.
Raj Thackeray: A Predictable Non-Factor
A secondary - but symbolically important - loss is that of Bal Thackeray’s nephew, Raj Thackeray. Despite periodic speculation that a reunion between cousins could resurrect the Thackeray aura, reality has once again intervened. Since his split from the parent organization, Raj has failed to establish himself as a consistent electoral force, barring a fleeting moment of relevance during the 2012 BMC elections.
The civic polls have now put to rest any lingering hope that the Thackeray legacy could be revived through familial consolidation. The aura that once commanded Mumbai’s streets and ballot boxes has dissipated beyond recovery.
Eknath Shinde: Winning Politically, Losing Strategically
If there is one leader who exemplifies the paradox of this election, it is Eknath Shinde. On paper, Shinde’s faction of the Shiv Sena entered the contest from a position of strength. Having briefly served as Chief Minister and having negotiated an impressive pre-poll allocation of nearly 90 seats from the senior coalition partner, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), expectations were high.
The results, however, tell a different story. Shinde’s faction converted only 24 of those 90 seats into victories - a performance that severely undercuts his strategic credibility. While the BJP may still depend on him numerically to secure the mayoral position, Shinde has failed in the more critical task of displacing Sena (UBT) in its traditional strongholds. To his coalition partner, this signals ineffectiveness rather than indispensability.
His poor showing outside Thane - his home turf - has further diminished his stature. In Navi Mumbai, where his party faced the BJP directly, Shinde’s faction was decisively outmaneuvered by the BJP’s entrenched local leader, Ganesh Naik. The implications are stark: Shinde now risks being seen not as a state-level leader or former Chief Minister, but as a narrowly influential suburban politician.
If Shinde intends to reverse this decline, the path ahead is clear but arduous. He must invest heavily in organizational rebuilding across South-Central Mumbai - Dadar, Parel, Worli, Prabhadevi - and, crucially, in the western suburbs such as Khar, Santacruz, Bandra West, and Chandivali, where he failed to meaningfully challenge Sena (UBT) despite favorable conditions.
A Dangerous Undercurrent: The Rise of AIMIM
Perhaps the most worrying development to emerge from these polls is the electoral breakthrough of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) in the MMR. This is not merely a local anomaly; it is a symptom of deeper polarization.
There is little doubt that the aggressive communal rhetoric employed by the ruling establishment has contributed to sections of society feeling politically marginalized. When secular alternatives fail to address such anxieties, voters gravitate toward openly communal platforms. For a region like Mumbai - the financial engine of the nation - this trajectory is deeply concerning. India’s history offers enough reminders of how communal polarization can derail economic and social progress.
If the national leadership is serious about the ideals of Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas, then this moment demands introspection. Dialing down divisive politics is no longer just a moral imperative; it is a strategic necessity.
Conclusion: The Legacy Ends, the Future Uncertain
In sum, these civic polls represent the first definitive nail in the coffin of Bal Thackeray’s political legacy - though likely not the last. Yet, paradoxically, the verdict is even more damning for the Shinde-led Shiv Sena. Having failed to convert opportunity into dominance, the faction now stands at a crossroads: undertake urgent organizational and ideological course correction, or acknowledge political reality and move toward a full merger with the BJP.
Mumbai has spoken clearly. The question is whether its leaders are listening.
.

Comments
Post a Comment